忍者ブログ

eevshrine

Referees-who-violate-the-rules-of-the-game-will--always-be-part-of-the-problem

×

[PR]上記の広告は3ヶ月以上新規記事投稿のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書く事で広告が消えます。

Referees-who-violate-the-rules-of-the-game-will--always-be-part-of-the-problem

India A coach Rahul Dravid went to the extent of lauding Pragyan Ojha, who was on a comeback trail in a first-class match after being reported for suspect action, for being confident enough to bowl with half-sleeves. “I was a long-time crusader against illegal bowling action and I fought hard to rid the game of it. “Most chuckers come from the sub-continent but they are not throwing on account of being Asians.

Umpires who turn a blind eye to the issue will always remain part of the problem and not solution,” he said.Hair wasn’t forthcoming when The Asian Age first contacted him, saying that his views on cricket was somewhat “outdated” as he has been out of cricket for seven years.Of late there has been a lot of suspicion on spinners who bowl with full sleeves.Exactly two decades later, the scourge of chucking continues to plague cricket as the likes of Harbhajan Singh, Saeed Ajmal, Sunil Narine, Pragyan Ojha, Mohammed Hafeez, Sachithra Senanayake and Tharindu Kaushal among others faced censure including suspension for their suspect action. I believe coaches encourage chucking and umpires are under pressure not to take action. People will call me a racist because both of them are white but unfortunately it is the state of cricket we find ourselves in now thanks to international administrators. “The only thing that mattered to me was whether he was breaking the game’s law,” he added. But he relented in the end to answer this newspaper’s questions.

The common thread in recent clampdowns is most of them were exposed only when they tried a few variations. “Graeme Swann and Nathan Lyon bowl with a fair action. For example, Narine got into trouble for a quicker ball. The opening day of the Boxing Day Test between Australia and Sri Lanka saw umpire Darrell Hair call legendary Lankan off-spinner Muttiah Muralitharan for no-ball seven times for chucking. How tough is it for an umpire to focus on the action of bowlers who always strive for variations in T20 “Both umpires have a duty to enforce the laws of cricket and they must take action if someone bowls an illegal delivery. “It is possible to bowl an over-spin delivery without bending and straightening the elbow but it’s impossible for a right-arm spinner to make the ball spin However, Hair, a veteran of 78 Tests and 139 ODIs, said he Sleevemaker TM-G-1Heat Shrinkable Sleeve never paid attention to a bowler’s attire during his umpiring days. He still believes Harbhajan and Ajmal bowl “with an illegal action” not only when they come up with a doosra but also when bowling normal off-spin.highsun-machinery. In the sub-continent they are being coached and encouraged to do so,” he said. Unfortunately, all the ICC did was change the rules to permit throwing and lessen the powers of umpires to take action then and there,” said the 63-year-old.

“I doubt whether anyone really cares about what I think,” the Australian said. By not doing so, they are rewarding cheating as well as penalising the batsman who has to find a way to play an illegal delivery without loosing his wicket. from leg to off without straightening his arm during the delivery swing,” the Australian said.

Even though Hair doesn’t watch much cricket these days, he readily came up with the names of a few bowlers with clean action.December 26 in 1995 turned out to be a defining day in the history of cricket.Hair may have retired as an umpire seven years ago but he feels the menace of chucking shows no signs of disappearing
PR

コメント

プロフィール

HN:
No Name Ninja
性別:
非公開

P R